Monday, August 24, 2009

Importance of life planning in Career

If you don't know where you are going any road will take you there.

Your job search will be more effective and rewarding if you do a little life planning before rushing out and applying for jobs.

Recent science research has shown that in the absence of visible landmarks or cues from the sun, people who are lost can not walk in a straight line (Current Biology 2009). Dropped in the forest on a cloudy day, people will indeed walk in circles, and the same is true for people dropped in the Sahara desert during the day and at night. We are genetically programmed to wander around.

I have seen the same thing in people's careers. A 30 year old mid-career marketing professional I interviewed recently is an example. Without any clear focus this person wandered around from job to job in different industries and locations with out any clear direction of focus. Each time the person was seeking happiness and each time they ended up back where they started, unhappy and looking for change.

So if you want to walk the straight line to career success, don't count on luck or your own sense of direction, create a 'career compass' and set your direction. Of course it is true that the map is not the territory, so you will have to accept that sometimes you will be 'off-course', but overall knowing your direction will help you make smart career decsions when opportunities come along.

This post was inspired by this Scientific American 60 second science podcast.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Know what to order from your Head hunter


In this second installment of a six part series, Tom Vovers explains a little about the different categories of search available and gives buyers some tips on how to choose the best type of search for their particular business circumstance.

"Often the best solution to a management problem is the right person” - Edwin Booz

Take out a pen and pencil and list down the ways you expect using a search firm will add value to your business. Like any professional service you will be paying a fee. Be clear about what you are buying.

Have you got your list? Ok, your check and see which of your items fall into these categories;
  • Administration ease;
  • Access to a professional mechanism for decision making;
  • Access to labour market knowledge;
Choose an executive search service that fits these needs. Below are three types of service. Be clear about what you are buying from your Executive Search Firm.

Recruitment Process Outsourcing
With this service you are effectively buying administrative ease. Your service provider will carry out all the administrative steps necessary to fulfill your own recruitment process. Good companies will help you develop this process. For example, HR2B recently hired a sales team of over 10 people for an education company using this service. Our clients were charged a fee on the number of CVs process, the number of interview held, the number of offers made etc.
  • Good for lower level daily hiring needs
  • Good for project hiring
  • Fee for service

Contingent Search
With this service you are buying the ability of "matching" between your opportunity and the candidates needs and desires. There is some administration and some market knowledge thrown in. It is called 'contingent' because if there is no match, then no fee is paid. In 2008 HR2B placed over 150 people using this service.
  • Good for middle to upper level opportunities
  • Hard to find skill sets
  • Fee based on success

Retained Search
With this service you are buying market knowledge. Your service provider needs to understand completely the shape of your industry, the people involved and then use their skill of matching to suggest to you people who can deliver results for your company. At HR2B we will typically do this service for C"X"O searches (CEO, CFO, CIO, etc.)
  • Good for higher level opportunities
  • Requires a lot of research upfront
  • Fee paid upfront and on success
Whatever service you choose it is important that you have a process to your hiring decisions. Our next article will deal with the standard search process. Happy headhunting,

Yours, Tom

Saturday, May 23, 2009

10 ways to Maximise your benefit from a headhunter

From a recent client survey we found that 60% of our customers had never used executive search services before. For us it is important that our customers know how to use us and to understand about our business. In this first of a six part series, Tom Vovers shares with us 10 ways employers can maximise their benefit from an executive search relationship. What are your comments?


1) Be concise on needs
Be clear about what you want from a candidate. What will be their unique contribution to your company? Avoid ambiguity in our requirements. A good headhunter will help you do this.

2) Be decisive on candidates
Sort into Yes, No and maybe. Re-sort maybe into yes and no. Commit to moving a person on in the process or remove them from the process. Again, this is not time to be wishy washy.

3) Search is not sift
If you find a good person accept them. Don't wait for more candidates. You are searching for the right person, so compare against your ideal, not compare across candidates.

4) Team work
Understand that your search is a team effort between the Headhunter, the line manager Decision Maker and your HR department. All 3 need to work smoothly together and ideally should have met at least once in the search.

5) Be clear on lines of responsibility
If it is everyone's responsibility then it is no-ones responsibility. Assign decision making authorities in advance of the search. Be clear with your headhunter what you expect.

6) Grant access to management team
Ideally the headhunter should be able to meet with everyone who will work with your candidate. This enables them to match on company culture and personal motivations as well as skills and experience.

7) Show interest in the search
If you are sent a confidential report, read it. Don't outsource responsibility for filling the role to your headhunter. It is a team effort and they will work with you in making the best possible placements.

8) Give prompt and complete feedback
Part of showing interest is to give prompt feedback. Good candidates have options. If you take time to give feedback the best candidates may have moved on to other companies. Be as precise in your feedback as possible. Simply saying "not suitable" leaves the headhunter and the candidate guessing. Use rejected candidates to be more precise about what you are looking for.

9) Use one firm per job

Avoid confusion in the market place and with your candidates. Having two firms searching for one role sends all the wrong messages to candidates and can lead to damaging your relationship with the headhunter.

10) Make job offers quickly and clearly and in writing
Use your head hunter to come up with an offer that the candidate will accept. Make one clear offer and then put it in writing. Don't waste time over terms and conditions.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Job offers are like Onions

Job
offers are like Onions – you need to peel each layer back to
see what is inside






Is
this the right place for me to work?


Ultimately,
this is the biggest career question you must face. Consider it
intelligence that's hidden deep in the onion. I'll try to help you
peel down to that level by offering you a simple set of criteria on
which to judge an employer.


Evaluate
an employer on three key factors:




  1. its people,


  2. its
    product, and


  3. its
    reputation.



As
we explore these factors in detail, you'll see that some aspects of
this approach are a little touchy-feely in nature, and some require
objective research and analysis. In most cases, this approach
requires a lot of something you probably do in your work: talking
with people.




1.
Make sure you'll be working with good people.

This
is not as obvious as it seems. Too often, the "point man"
who hires you is one of only a few people you meet at a company
before you start to work there. But to assess the "goodness"
of the people in the company you have to explore much further.


Explore
the depths.
Taking
a job is a little like deciding whether to marry someone. The more of
his (or her) friends you meet, the more likely you'll know what
you're getting into. Explore a company in enough depth to get a good
idea of who you will be living with day in, day out.


Never
assume a company's personality and character match that of the
manager who's hiring you. Once hired, you will likely spend more time
with people you've never met than with the guy who hired you -- and
you'll be impacted by the decisions these people make.


Chart
the players.

Draw a picture of your workday and your work month. Lay out the tasks
you'll be doing, and then draw lines to all the departments and
specific people who will be working with you and whose work will
impact your ability to do yours. Ask the manager conducting the
interview to help you create this chart.


Then
explain that you'll need to meet some of these people -- all of them,
if possible. The meetings can be brief, but they're critical. If the
employer balks, explain yourself simply: "I work hard and I'm a
great producer. Some people will be significantly affected by my
work, and they will affect my ability to do my work as well. It's in
all of our interests to make sure we can work together."


Managers
are a special case in your little drawing "Will I be working for
you personally for the next year? If I'm your direct report, will I
report to anyone else on a dotted line?"


Managers
set the tone for how the work is done across a company. Meeting as
many "other" managers as you can, in advance, is a great
way to assess how the entire company functions. ("Before I take
this sales job, I'd like to meet the manager of customer service and
the marketing manager.") Perhaps best of all, once you've met
these managers in your interviews, you will have established a
rapport that will serve you well later.


Probe
for character.

Meeting the key players will quickly help you see what life will be
like on a job. Too often, job candidates see a very appealing job and
take it, only to find that the people they have to work with (not
necessarily in their own department) are inept, unmotivated or
unenthusiastic -- or that they have a completely different work
ethic.


Try
to figure out who will be part of your cross-departmental work team
and spend a little time with them before you join up. Have lunch with
them. Encourage them to talk about how they do their work, and how
they'd be interacting with you. Learn about their expectations and
their standards.


While
you're assessing all these personalities, you can probe the company's
character. Ask each employee about management's reward practices --
do they acknowledge good performers with raises, promotions, new
projects and exciting work?


Finally,
do a search (at the library and online) for the key players in the
organization. See what the professional and business press has to say
about them.


Control
the onion.

Don't base your decision to take a job strictly on the people the
company wants you to meet. An interview should cut two ways: they get
to know you, and you get to know them. Many companies will be
surprised when you make this request prior to accepting an offer.
That's why it's sometimes best to wait until they've made a solid
commitment to you. Once you have the offer, you have more control and
they're less likely to refuse. The onion is in your hands; keep
peeling.


Now,
this is not permission to go overboard and conduct an inquisition. Be
reasonable. But, you want to know whether the people you'll be
working with, especially the managers, are going your way.




2.
Make sure the company produces a good product or service.

This
may seem silly. Who would join a company that makes a poor product?


Unfortunately,
the "hot job market" mentality leads many people to think
short-term and to base job decisions primarily on the size of a
compensation package and on whether the company is in a "hot"
field. (The latter is referred to as "wanting a challenge").
Smart workers think long-term and recognize that one of the real
career challenges today revolves around finding an employer that
knows how to manage its business so it will "survive to play
again" next year.


Take
the long view.

Don't judge a company just on the gleam in some manager's eye, or on
the hot technology they tell you they're developing. Judge a company
also on what it successfully ships out the door and on how happy its
customers are, because that's what will pay your salary and provide
you with more work.


A
"hot" product may not be a good product. And no product
stands alone -- it's usually part of a constellation of products that
either combine to make the company successful or that hang apart and
turn the company's search for success into a wild goose chase.
Likewise, the hot technology (or service) a company is touting -- and
which you're so eager to work with -- may mask product and business
problems you know nothing about.


Judge
and judge some more.

You judge a product or service by comparing it to competing or
similar products. You can also try to benchmark the product against
itself.




  • What did it look like a
    year ago? Two? Five?


  • How
    has it evolved to meet the needs of customers?


  • Has
    the product changed on a continuous curve, or has it made leaps that
    significantly changed the way its customers benefit from it?


  • Is
    the product driving the market or following it? (Make an educated
    guess about which competing product might replace this one in
    customers' minds a year or three down the road.)


  • Does
    the organization take risks to drive improvements? Or, has it been
    complacent?


  • How
    much does the company spend on training?


  • Does
    the company develop its "people assets" as aggressively as
    it develops technology?


  • Does
    it demonstrate that it's a long-term player in its industry?



All
these measures will suggest something about the future, and about how
your own ideas/contributions might be met by management. These are
issues to research independently, but you should also discuss them in
your interview. If an offer has already been extended, request an
additional meeting to go over these strategic questions.


If
the product isn't a good one, neither is the job offer.





3.
Make sure the company has a good reputation.

We
all like to be forgiving, but sometimes that leads to wishful
thinking.


Separate
fact from opinion.

Don't gamble on your first impressions. It may be that a headhunter
has told you great things about a company. Maybe you read the company
is about to introduce a promising new product, or you've heard about
its rapid rise in the stock market.


Take
careful note: none of these data points are on the reputation graph;
they're measures of opinion. Reputation is more complex; its a
tougher onion to peel. Assessing a company's reputation requires
talking to the people who depend on the company for their own
success.


Track
down the truth.

To really get at a company's reputation, follow the money.




  • Who buys the products?


  • Who
    sells the company the "parts" or contracted services it
    needs?


  • Who
    funds it?


  • Who
    competes with the company?


  • Who
    works there?


  • Who
    used to work there?



Track
down and talk with the company's customers, its vendors, its
competitors and its employees. Talk to the investment bankers who
provide the cash and the credit. Each of them will give you a
different perspective on the business, but all of them have skin in
the game. Their assessments matter because their own futures hinge on
the company's success -- and the company's success hinges on them.


Next,
search the professional and business media for information. Talk to
reporters who write about the organization. You'll quickly identify
the trends, and you'll develop questions to ask management.


Most
important, talk to the customers and the employees. When a reputation
breaks, these are the people who know it first. Review the questions
in this article with them. (Be diplomatic and discreet, but be firm.)
You'll learn a great deal.


Perhaps
more than anything else, a good reputation gets a company through the
hard times, past the mistakes, and positions it to survive the
vicissitudes of life in the business world. A company's reputation
may vary depending on who you're talking to. That's why you need lots
of data points before you can conclude that this is a place you'd
want to be associated with.




Inside
the onion: people, products and reputation

You
can try to evaluate an offer and guess at the value of your future in
dollars, but ultimately even the dollars depend on the people, the
products and the reputation to which you bind yourself. That's what
you must peel the offer down to.


Perhaps
the most important thought I can leave you with is this: while a job
offer spells out the bucks, the three decision factors we've reviewed
here are never laid out for you. You must assess them for yourself,
and it's no easy task. Putting an employer under this kind of
scrutiny takes a lot of thought, research and time spent talking with
the people who will impact your future.


But,
once you've got the information you need, you'll be able to put the
compensation, the benefits and the learning experience into
perspective when evaluating your offers and counteroffers.







Thursday, May 7, 2009

5 mistakes Job seekers make

Some great advice from the USA that applies to Vietnam too.

From Heather Boerner, for Yahoo! HotJobs

Mistakes People make when they are laid off or retrenched:

1. Not recognizing their feelings. Losing a job is a major stresser. Aside from the obvious effects on your financial security, there are all those feelings of low self-esteem and despression to deal with. Don't ignore the feelings. Accept them and get on with the business of getting a new job.

2. Don't make your only goal just getting a job. Make smaller increments your goals. Boerner recommends:

* Instead of "I will get a job in X field this year," try "I will send out five resumes this week."
* Instead of "I will have three job interviews this month," try "I will call five people for informational interviews today."

3. Don't apply for every job you're remotely qualified for. That will only increase your chances of getting rejected and further erode your self-esteem.

4. Avoid negative people and experiences. If there is someone or something in your life that drains you emotionally, avoid it.

5. Don't put yourself in a "settling" state of mind. You didn't ask for it, but being laid off offers you an opportunity to figure out what you're really passionate about. Don't always go for the job you know you can do — go for the one you want to do.

see full article

Friday, April 3, 2009

Falling at the HR Department Hurdle


Executive Search Service for professional level opportunities involves handling softer less tangible selection criteria than can be found on a person's or by conducting a general interview. Our clients are looking for people that will fit with their company culture. This is where HR2B and other reputable Executive Search firms can really add value to your business.

We specialize in "getting under the skin" of our candidates, to know them, to understand their feelings and motivations and to help them decide what is best for them in their working life decisions. We verify our experienced perceptions by reference checking and fact checking.

We match this with our client's requirements. That is why it is vital for us to meet, discuss requirements and get feedback from the hiring decision maker. The hiring manager.

Human Resources departments play an important role in facilitating this relationship, and in providing us with the confidence that the manager we are talking to does in fact have the authority and permission to make a hire. Many HR departments try and stay in the middle of this relationship leading to slow process, unclear communications and a missed opportunity to make the best possible use of resources and talent.

Recently one of our fortune 500 customers changed their policy. We have been working with them for over 3 years providing a steady pipeline of talented people to their business in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City.

This client employed a new Vietnamese HR manager who interpreted a global policy as saying that line managers could not talk to executive search companies. He had this inserted in our scope of work. We tried to operate like this for 3 months and had many difficulties. We met with this client and explained the difficulties of slow process and inaccurate or incomplete feedback. Our old route of problem escalation via "Regional HR" had been downsized due to the recent economic crisis. Last week we had the line managers of this company contacting our consultants directly, and asking us to provide them with candidates for review before the "HR Department Hurdle".

Today I have ended the contract with this firm. The reason is that we have an obligation to our candidates to be their partner through their job role change process. The actions of this fortune 500 company prevented us from keeping our promise to our candidates.

The reaction of the Vietnamese HR management was to be 'administrators' of a global policy rather than trying to add value to their employer organisation and partnering with us in the difficult endevour of finding the right people for their business. They have made themselves into an obstacle rather than a resource. A wasted opportunity.

Hopefully soon this company will change and we will have the chance to partner with them again. In the meantime we can already see their employer brand becoming less shiny in the Vietnam market. This will surely be costly to that organisation, but more importantly it is bad for the good people who are working in there whose reputation will be dragged down along with their employer.

In this new connected world where LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter and other social networking sites allow instant communications between people of all levels, it is quaint of HR departments to think they can stand between their managers and the outside world. Yes there has to be controls and monitoring, however modern organisations have to open themselves up to allow value adding activities to happen faster and easily.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Ebb and Flow of Power Erodes Trust in Relationships


OK, it is after mid-day so this post is not an April-fools day joke!

Changing economic times have created a tidal change in the balance of power between the employer - employee in Vietnam.

In the 'good old days' before 2001, talented Vietnamese would join with an organisation and pretty well stay there. Sure there was the labour contract, but there was also the unwritten emotional contract between employer and employee. The employer would continue to provide meaningful work with adequate salary and the employee would enthusiastically apply their skills and experience to the business success.

During the 'over-heated days' of 2007/2008 the tide flowed to the employee side. Talented people left the stable life to join fast growing companies who offered a different contract of high risk / high reward. Employers who did not have their retention programs in place suffered, either by losing talent or by over paying to keep good staff.

In 2009 the tide is turning towards employers having more power. As economies slow around the world, employers are faced with a wider range of candidates for fewer roles. Skilled overseas Vietnamese are returning to their home country, and they are affordable. New foreign firms have slowed their plans for Vietnam while things are uncertain at home. Salary demands have slowed. However can employers offer true job security in these uncertain times?

For the future I am sure the tide will once again change. Employees will again have the upper hand as the pace of economic growth increases in Vietnam and around the world.

So what is the lesson here?

For both sides it is important to remember that whatever the current level of the tide, eventually it will change and probably sooner than later. The speed of these changes recently has meant the erosion of trust, which will take longer to return.

For employers, take actions to build the level of trust with your keys employees (this assumes you know who they are already). Make sure this group is protected in your cost cutting measures.

For employees, understand that your employer or future employer might lack trust in you. Build trust by continuing to work on a strong track record of achievements in your current role. Not only will this increase your employ-ability, but it will also provide you with the opportunity to learn and develop new skills.